Shaun Bill elected term ends in 2017 [Not running for reelection. It seems he is running uncontested for Morton Park District Commissioner. Three positions and three candidates.]
Clint Heinold elected term ends in 2017 [Not running for reelection.]
Kelly Scarfe elected term ends in 2017 [Not running for reelection.]
Michelle Bernier elected term ends in 2019
Note: [ ] = my additions
Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 44 years ago as of January 22, 2017
Over 44 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. Evil personified!
ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß
Two months after the 44th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, approximately 161,644 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the murders continue day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children?
Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý
Petition to defund the United Nations:
http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/defund-the-united-nations-h/
The UN is a completely failed organization. It needs to be defunded
¨ For its attacks on the sovereign State of Israel,
¨ For its promotion of and support for murdering babies within the womb and the radical homosexual agenda.
¨ For supporting and promoting the scientific nonsense of man-made global warming,
¨ And for its call for one world government in direct violation of the sovereignty of the United States of America.
¨ Then, the US needs to get out of the UN and get the UN out of the US.
Petition: Defund Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood]
http://liveaction.org/petition/
“Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] received over $500 million in forced taxpayer funding last year [fiscal year]. I stand with my fellow Americans in a nationwide call to defund the nation’s largest abortion [murder of babies within the womb] corporation.”
Video: https://www.facebook.com/liveaction/videos/10154979597013728/?utm_source=Live+Action&utm_campaign=ae72609e00-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_01_23&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b50982edcd-ae72609e00-86729901
Donate: https://donate.liveaction.org/checkout/donation?eid=115314?utm_source=autoreplyemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pppetition
Petition to Defund Planned Murderhood NOW!: https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/congress-must-de-fund-planned-parenthood-immediately.html
“Congress Must De-Fund Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] Immediately
Target: United States Congress
Region: United States of America
Website: www.LifeNews.com”
NO organization, including Planned Murderhood, which is involved in any way with the sinful, evil, barbaric practice of murdering babies within the womb should ever receive our taxpayer money!
Petition: http://nationalprolifealliance.com/lacAM_petition.aspx?pid=0219&npla=EH17
Abolishing the murder of babies within the womb by Congressional law will actually be faster and more effective than waiting on the court. Right now there are five justices on the court who support the murder of babies within the womb. The four radical Leftist justices appointed by Democrat Presidents and Justice Kennedy. Therefore, to even have a chance of the court reversing, we need two more Constitutional Justices and the second one has to replace one of the five pro-murdering babies within the womb justices. Even then, it would take a couple of years, at least, to get the case through the court system.
Passing a law of Congress is the best way of ending the terror of our American holocaust. The best way to abolish the murder of babies within the womb. The best way to stop any State from passing a law allowing the murder of babies within the womb. And it is also best constitutionally.
Life for all persons within the United States including babies within the womb is guaranteed and protected by the Declaration of Independence, Amendment V of the United States Constitution, and Amendment XIV of the United States Constitution. No court, no government body, no individual can constitutionally sanction the murder of babies within the womb. All such decisions, laws, and regulations are patently unconstitutional and illegal and should be immediately abolished by Congress by law!
Statistically, everyday of delay over 2,700 babies are murdered in the womb through abortion using 1 million abortions a year as a baseline. It is past time to attack the evil of murdering babies within the womb on every front with every legal weapon we can use until the murder of babies within the womb is abolished completely throughout the United States and its territories. Murder of babies within the womb is a horrendous evil that needs to and must be terminated.
“ACTION ALERT: Designate the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization
From: Act for America
February 28, 2017
‘ … the Muslim Brotherhood is the oldest Islamic terrorist organization in the world, and has served as the mothership for radical jihadists for almost a century.”
“ … two bills affirming that the Muslim Brotherhood be designated as a foreign terrorist entity have been reintroduced in the 115th Congress, we must once again take advantage of our influence on Capitol Hill and let our elected officials know how strongly we feel about the necessity of this designation.
Please call and/or send our pre-written email to your elected officials, and tell them to support the passage of The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act.
Call Your Representative Now
Email Your Representative Now
For Freedom,
ACT for America”
Legislative Action Center: https://cqrcengage.com/act/
Donate: https://actforamerica.nationbuilder.com/donate?utm_campaign=aalert&utm_medium=email&utm_source=actforamerica
The link: http://cqrcengage.com/act/app/onestep-write-a-letter?0&engagementId=276273
ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß
New Video on Muslim Brotherhood. Watch
UNMASKED: Brigitte Gabriel Exposes The Muslim Brotherhood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0B-KUwpPj8&feature=youtu.be
Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý
Brigitte Gabriel on True Women’s Rights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTkG6PKnNFw&feature=youtu.be
DEMAND FULL REPEAL of OBAMACARE
Petition: http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/demand-full-repeal-of-obamacare/
Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation
“Reality Check: No, Tomi, You Cannot Be Pro-Choice and Conservative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsWXkIf-sYc ”
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
Isaiah 1: 1-31 (NIV)
The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem [Applicable to the United States today, in my opinion. GOD is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow. HE is righteous, just, and true yesterday, today, and tomorrow!] that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.
Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth! For the Lord has spoken: ‘I reared children and brought them up, but they have rebelled against me [The United States has and is rebelling against GOD!]. The ox knows its master, the donkey its owner’s manger, but Israel [the United States] does not know, my people [the United States] do not understand.’
Woe to the sinful nation [the United States], a people whose guilt is great, a brood of evildoers, children given to corruption! They have forsaken the Lord; they have spurned the Holy One of Israel [the United States] and turned their backs on him.
Why should you be beaten anymore? Why do you persist in rebellion? Your whole head is injured, your whole heart afflicted. From the sole of your foot to the top of your head there is no soundness—only wounds and welts and open sores, not cleansed or bandaged or soothed with olive oil.
Your country is desolate, your cities burned with fire; your fields are being stripped by foreigners right before you, laid waste as when overthrown by strangers. Daughter Zion is left like a shelter in a vineyard, like a hut in a cucumber field, like a city under siege. Unless the Lord Almighty had left us some survivors, we would have become like Sodom [destroyed by GOD because of homosexual sin!], we would have been like Gomorrah [destroyed by GOD because of homosexual sin!].
[Read Genesis 18 and 19 for the Biblical account. Genesis 19: 23-29 (NIV)]
“By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens. Thus he [GOD] overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities [A righteous act by a righteous GOD WHO destroyed evil people who refused to repent from their evil. And yes, I believe the account and so did JESUS the SON of GOD. HE referenced Sodom and/or Gomorrah several times. Matthew 10: 15 (NIV) “Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.”]—and also the vegetation in the land. But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.
Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the Lord. He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnace.
So when God destroyed the cities of the plain, he remembered Abraham, and he [GOD] brought Lot out of the catastrophe that overthrew the cities where Lot had lived.”
This is also why homosexual radicals attack Christians who speak out against homosexual behavior. Christians who know the Bible know that homosexual behavior is sin punishable by spiritual death. There is NO “right” to homosexual behavior and people are NOT born homosexual. Homosexual behavior is learned behavior. Therefore, people do not have to be involved in the behavior and people can repent and STOP being involved in the behavior!]
Hear the word of the Lord, you rulers of Sodom [the United States]; listen to the instruction of our God, you people of Gomorrah [the United States]! ‘The multitude of your sacrifices—what are they to me?’ says the Lord. ‘I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals; I have no pleasure in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats. When you come to appear before me, who has asked this of you, this trampling of my courts? Stop bringing meaningless offerings! Your incense is detestable to me. New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations—I cannot bear your worthless assemblies. Your New Moon feasts and your appointed festivals I hate with all my being. They have become a burden to me; I am weary of bearing them. When you spread out your hands in prayer, I hide my eyes from you [the present or the future for the United States?]; even when you offer many prayers, I am not listening [the present or the future for the United States?].
Your hands are full of blood [the present for the United States as we as a nation MURDER over a million babies a year through government sanctioned abortions!]!
Wash and make yourselves clean [Will we?]. Take your evil deeds out of my sight [Will we?]; stop doing wrong [Will we?]. Learn to do right [Will we?]; seek justice [Will we?]. Defend the oppressed [Will we? Who are more oppressed than murdered babies?]. Take up the cause of the fatherless [Will we? GOD’S family structure not man’s]; plead the case of the widow [Will we? GOD’S family structure not man’s].’
‘Come now, let us settle the matter,’ says the Lord. ‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool. If you are willing and obedient [Stop rebelling], you will eat the good things of the land; but if you resist and rebel, you will be devoured by the sword.’ For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.
See how the faithful city has become a prostitute! She once was full of justice; righteousness used to dwell in her—but now murderers! Your silver has become dross, your choice wine is diluted with water. Your rulers are rebels, partners with thieves; they all love bribes and chase after gifts. They do not defend the cause of the fatherless; the widow’s case does not come before them.
Therefore the Lord, the Lord Almighty, the Mighty One of Israel, declares: ‘Ah! I will vent my wrath on my foes and avenge myself on my enemies. I will turn my hand against you; I will thoroughly purge away your dross and remove all your impurities. I will restore your leaders as in days of old, your rulers as at the beginning. Afterward you will be called the City of Righteousness, the Faithful City.’
Zion will be delivered with justice, her penitent ones with righteousness. But rebels and sinners will both be broken, and those who forsake the Lord will perish. ‘You will be ashamed because of the sacred oaks in which you have delighted; you will be disgraced because of the gardens that you have chosen. You will be like an oak with fading leaves, like a garden without water. The mighty man will become tinder and his work a spark; both will burn together, with no one to quench the fire.’”
I received this article late last week. I have had some misgiving about Judge Gorsuch’s appointment to the Supreme Court since I did my own brief vetting of him. I laid those misgivings aside based upon the support for him from many conservative groups. His confirmation vote has been postponed until next week.
I have removed the petition to confirm his nomination. I am not ready to say do not confirm. I do believe his nomination should be reexamined. Ultimately, though, we will not know with certainty how he will rule as a member of the Supreme Court until he is on the Supreme Court making decisions. If he is really a strict constructionist, his personal opinion on the issues will not make a difference. The question is two fold. Is he a strict constructionist? Will he be seduced by the power he has as a member of the Supreme Court? Power not given to the court but power the court has been allowed to exert because the courts are not held accountable.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/neil-gorsuch-is-not-another-scalia
“Neil Gorsuch is NOT another Scalia
Steve Jalsevac | March 24, 2017
March 24, 2017 (LifeSiteNews)—I have been holding my opinion on Neil Gorsuch. From the time he was announced as Trump’s highly lauded Supreme Court nominee and then more information started to come out about him, there have been growing uncomfortable feelings about the nomination. And now, as the confirmation hearings have been underway, I am worried.
Despite effusive praise from numerous pro-life and pro-family leaders, this man is NOT, as Trump has repeatedly been told, another Scalia [No one is. Every judge is unique just as every person is unique. Even identical twins are unique as they are exposed to the life experiences that every person has.] In my view, the President has been misled—although Gorsuch does have praiseworthy characteristics as a justice and has made some excellent, major rulings.
But can we trust that he will courageously rule as the nation desperately needs him to rule on all of the most crucial issues? I think there are now legitimate doubts, although on many issues he will likely rule well [We have no guarantee how any judge will rule. That is why the Constitution does not give them the powers they have usurped. The Founding Fathers understand the fragilities and sinful nature of human beings.].
During day three of the Senate confirmation hearings, Gorsuch was asked by Senator Dick Durbin whether the intentional taking of unborn life is wrong.
He responded, ‘The Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe v. Wade that a fetus [baby] is not a person [The court was absolutely wrong.], for purposes of the 14th Amendment. That (decision) is the law of the land [No it is not. Courts have no constitutional authority to make law.]. I accept the law of the land [Then he does not accept the court decision because court decisions are not the law of the land.].’
[According to the Constitution, the supreme law of the land consists of the following:
Article VI ¶ 2
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land….” Absolutely NO mention of federal court decisions being the law of the land let alone the supreme law of the land. None. Zero. Nothing. Zilch. Nil. Nada.]
To me, there was something unnerving about how far he went in accepting the current realities of that horrendous decision [Second worst decision in our history. The first being Roe vs. Wade and related decisions. The third being the Dred Scott decision.] that was based on lies and deliberate misinterpretation of the Constitution.
Gorsuch on Obergefell
Also during the confirmation hearings, in response to a question about same-sex ‘marriage’ and the results of the Obergefell decision—which many consider an even more outrageously corrupt, activist Supreme Court decision than Roe v Wade—Gorsuch stated it ‘is absolutely settled law [There is no such thing as absolutely settle law. As a lawyer and a judge, he should know this.].’
He did not just call it ‘settled law,’ which one could say, well, yes, in legal terms that is what it could be said to be … for now. But he unnecessarily and disturbingly added the word ‘absolutely.’ Why did he go to that length?
That comment seemed to indicate Gorsuch is not a full constitutional originalist. No originalist would ever make such a comment that appears to betray the Constitution and the intentions of the Founders—considering the travesty of the Obergefell decision.
Now we likely know why Trump also called Obergefell ‘settled law’ in response to a question during a 60 Minutes interview. He had likely been talking to Gorsuch [Conjecture?].
Justice Scalia had ripped the Obergefell decision to shreds for its inventions of nonexistent rights out of thin air [As he should have. Why I called for the impeachment and convict of the five justices who violated the Constitution and their oath of office to reach such an obscene, perverse decision.], as he did with many other judicial activist decisions by his peers on the court and in lower courts. He described the decision as the ‘furthest imaginable extension of the Supreme Court doing whatever it wants [This is the real problem. No one is holding federal court judges accountable.].’ He added, ‘Do you really want your judges to rewrite the Constitution [They have been for decades and decades.]? I don’t know how you can get more extreme than that [Murdering babies within the womb.].’
Scalia even went so far as to argue that legalizing same-sex ‘marriage’ was a ‘threat to American democracy [Rewriting the Constitution by judicial fiat is a threat to American democracy.].’
Gorsuch’s criticism of Trump
It is understandable that Gorsuch would be circumspect during his confirmation hearings in response to questions about particular cases, but he has seemed to exhibit a pro-judicial arrogance, deferring too much to the reputations and status of justices who in very many cases in these times do not at all deserve such deference.
Many deserve harsh criticism, if not condemnation and censure [What they deserve is impeachment and conviction.]. It is long overdue.
I was taken aback by Gorsuch’s publicly expressed rebuke of Donald Trump’s legitimate criticisms of the court ruling that rejected his first immigration Executive Order.
Trump accused the appellate court of being ‘so political.’ He labeled a judge who ruled on his executive order a ‘so-called judge’ and referred to the ruling as ‘ridiculous.’
Perhaps Trump should not have used the term ‘so-called judge,’ but the ruling was indeed ‘ridiculous’ and totally out-of-order. It clearly violated established presidential privilege and was a raw abuse of the powers of the court for partisan and ideological intentions [Which is the new normal.].
It was about time someone in high authority called judicial activist justices to account [Not just the President. Congress and the American voter too.]. They have been destroying the rule of law in America and trashing the Constitution. For years they have been far overstepping their Constitutional authority [Absolutely correct. Congress, the President, and the voting public have allowed it to happen.].
Gorsuch told a senator that the president’s comments were ‘demoralizing and disheartening.’ Did he really have to go that far? Why could he not have acknowledged that yes, there have been many very questionable rulings by activist judges in recent decades?
The Washington Post wrote that ‘Gorsuch ‘stated very emotionally and strongly his belief in his fellow judges’ integrity and the principle of judicial independence [What the federal courts have been doing is not judicial independence. It is judicial usurpation of authority. Also known as judicial activism.].’’ Really? All judges, given the many outrageous decisions we have seen?
Justice Scalia never held back and had no regard for popular opinions, political correctness or what the other justices thought about him. As well, his solid Catholic Christian formation taught him about right and wrong and his serious duty to the American people and to God to honor the Constitution and the intentions of the Founding Fathers. He was not perfect [No one is. Which is why the Constitution has a very limited role for judges. The Constitution has not been followed in the scope of the courts’ authority for decades and decades.], but he frequently issued highly principled legal opinions.
Gorsuch’s comment that Obergefell ‘is absolutely settled law’ could be seen to have been insulting to judicial conservatives. I would go so far to say it indicated clear danger about how he would rule on the court—on certain issues.
Following are some of the stories that we published on the Obergefell decision:
Obergefell is so awful that it makes Dred Scott look like a piece of lawyerly precision
How Obergefell is Roe v. Wade redux
Obergefell: the states’ duty to seek rehearing
Trump undermined Justices Scalia, Roberts, Thomas and Alito in saying marriage issue ‘settled’
Serious questions about Gorsuch and homosexuality
There have also been other signs about Gorsuch that too many have tended to pooh-pooh as being significant. Well, they are important signs.
A February New York Times article [Who believes anything reported by The New York Times?] indicated that Gorsuch is pro-homosexual. This may explain his excessively accepting comment on the Obergefell decision.
In a LifeSite article on the Times report, we noted,
‘n his personal relationships with homosexual friends and co-workers, Judge Gorsuch has been very approving of homosexual relationships.’
Gorsuch also attends a socially liberal Episcopal church in Boulder, led by a pro-LGBT female pastor, Rev. Jill Springer, who reportedly supports homosexual “marriage.”’
Matthew Hoffman, in his in-depth report on Gorsuch expands on Springer’s liberal excesses,
‘According to an exposé published by the Daily Mail, she openly supports homosexual ‘marriage’ and conducts blessings of same-sex couples, and attended the ultra-feminist ‘Women’s March on Washington’ to protest the Trump presidency. She also denounced “criticism and disrespectful rhetoric” regarding Islam following the San Bernadino terrorist attack in 2015. The Washington Post’s own investigation of the parish also found that the pastor engages in leftist political activism.’
And yet, Hoffman reports,
‘Gorsuch and his family are far from being mere passive participants in the church. Gorsuch himself serves as an usher, and his wife as a lector, and his two daughters have served as acolytes during worship services.’
and
‘The Episcopal Church has also issued statements opposing any legal restrictions on the killing of the unborn, and holding that abortion can be justified in cases of risks to the physical or mental health of the mother, rape, incest, or fetal malformation [All wrong and all in violation of the word of GOD! A church is not the church just because it calls itself a church just as a man is not a woman just because he calls himself a woman.].’’
There is no way that Justice Scalia approved of homosexual relationships. He would never have regularly attended such a liberal Church as Gorsuch has and Scalia would have run from a parish with a pro-LGBT pastor that strongly supports homosexual ‘marriage’ and opposes any legal restrictions on abortion.
Scalia, from his orthodox Catholic Christian formation and affiliation, knew right from wrong and was frequently outspoken about such matters when circumstances demanded it. He did not deprive those who needed to hear uncomfortable truths from the charity of those truths.
The LifeSite article on the NY Times report [Who believes anything reported by The New York Times?] continued that,
‘… Gorsuch reacted when his close friend and former Harvard classmate Phil Berg told him that he had a ‘boyfriend.’
‘He [Gorsuch] didn’t skip a beat,’ Berg said, saying that the conversation led to a ‘special bond’ between he [him is the correct pronoun] and Gorsuch. ‘It was a huge deal for me, and it made a lasting impression.’
Similarly, the Harvard Crimson reports that Gorsuch offered Harvard classmate Berg ‘unwavering support’ when Berg ‘came out’ to him as homosexual.’
and,
‘Along the same lines, Joshua Goodbaum, a former clerk to Gorsuch, told the Times that his boss was ‘thrilled’ for him and his ‘husband’ when they got same-sex-‘married’ in 2014:
‘He was actually kind of syrupy about it. I remember him saying, ‘You’re going to see how wonderful this is for your relationship,’’ Goodbaum said.’
Gorsuch is said to be a strong proponent of Natural Law. His above noted statements and actions on homosexuality defy that claim [He is accepting of sinful behavior. Always wrong.].
As well, no authentic, believing Christian would ever offer such affirmation to persons engaged in behavior that threatened serious emotional, psychological, and physical harm, and especially devastating spiritual harm [The unrepentant waging of sin is spiritual death.].
I cannot remotely fathom Justice Antonin Scalia ever having been so blind to his sacred responsibility to his fellow man as Neil Gorsuch appeared to exhibit (if these quotes are true) in response to his friends with same-sex attractions.
I hope my concerns about Gorsuch are not as serious as they seem, but the things noted here cannot be ignored [Agreed.].
We must continue to pray for the best outcome for the next justice of the Supreme Court. May God’s will be done on this because of the crucial importance of this and future Supreme Court nominations for the welfare of the United States.
* For a balanced, thorough and well-researched report on Gorsuch written by LifeSite’s Matthew Hoffman before the confirmation hearings began, see ‘Neil Gorsuch: The new Scalia…or something else?’”
Judge Gorsuch also clerked for justice Kennedy who is a pro-murder of babies within the womb and pro-homosexual everything justice. Justice Kennedy was the difference in the Obergefell case and I said at the time that ALL five of the justices should be impeached including justice Kennedy who is the only one of the five appointed by a Republican President. Then google locked me out of all my blogs.
The real problem is not one appointment to the Supreme Court or any other federal court. The real problem is that the judges on the federal courts have been usurping their authority for decades upon decades and they have NOT been held accountable by Congress, the President, and the voting public.
Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation
For Life, for liberty
Don L. Vance
“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.