Saturday, April 8, 2017

The Senate Confirms Neil Gorsuch to the United States Supreme Court After a Contentious Nomination Process

Four of the seven Morton, Illinois District 709 School Board members voted to support transsexual sexual delusions. TheFour Pretendersare:

Shaun Bill elected term ends in 2017 [Not running for reelection. He is off the school board in early May.]

Clint Heinold elected term ends in 2017 [Not running for reelection He is off the school board in early May.]

Kelly Scarfe elected term ends in 2017 [Not running for reelection She is off the school board in early May.]

Michelle Bernier elected term ends in 2019 [Will she run for reelection after the results of this election?]

Note: [ ] = my additions

Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 44 years ago as of January 22, 2017

Over 44 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. Evil personified!

ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß    
Two months after the 44th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, approximately 161,644 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the murders continue day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children?

Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý

Petition to defund the United Nations:

http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/defund-the-united-nations-h/

The UN is a completely failed organization. It needs to be defunded

¨ For its attacks on the sovereign State of Israel,

¨ For its promotion of and support for murdering babies within the womb and the radical homosexual agenda.

¨ For supporting and promoting the scientific nonsense of man-made global warming,

¨ And for its call for one world government in direct violation of the sovereignty of the United States of America.

¨ Then, the US needs to get out of the UN and get the UN out of the US.

Petition: Defund Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood]

http://liveaction.org/petition/

“Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] received over $500 million in forced taxpayer funding last year [fiscal year]. I stand with my fellow Americans in a nationwide call to defund the nations largest abortion [murder of babies within the womb] corporation.”

Video: https://www.facebook.com/liveaction/videos/10154979597013728/?utm_source=Live+Action&utm_campaign=ae72609e00-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_01_23&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b50982edcd-ae72609e00-86729901

Donate: https://donate.liveaction.org/checkout/donation?eid=115314?utm_source=autoreplyemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pppetition



Petition to Defund Planned Murderhood NOW!: https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/congress-must-de-fund-planned-parenthood-immediately.html

“Congress Must De-Fund Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] Immediately

Target: United States Congress
Region: United States of America
Website: www.LifeNews.com

NO organization, including Planned Murderhood, which is involved in any way with the sinful, evil, barbaric practice of murdering babies within the womb should ever receive our taxpayer money!



Petition: http://nationalprolifealliance.com/lacAM_petition.aspx?pid=0219&npla=EH17

Abolishing the murder of babies within the womb by Congressional law will actually be faster and more effective than waiting on the court. Right now there are five justices on the court who support the murder of babies within the womb. The four radical Leftist justices appointed by Democrat Presidents and Justice Kennedy. Therefore, to even have a chance of the court reversing, we need two more Constitutional Justices and the second one has to replace one of the five pro-murdering babies within the womb justices. Even then, it would take a couple of years, at least, to get the case through the court system.

Passing a law of Congress is the best way of ending the terror of our American holocaust. The best way to abolish the murder of babies within the womb. The best way to stop any State from passing a law allowing the murder of babies within the womb. And it is also best constitutionally.

Life for all persons within the United States including babies within the womb is guaranteed and protected by the Declaration of Independence, Amendment V of the United States Constitution, and Amendment XIV of the United States Constitution. No court, no government body, no individual can constitutionally sanction the murder of babies within the womb. All such decisions, laws, and regulations are patently unconstitutional and illegal and should be immediately abolished by Congress by law!

Statistically, everyday of delay over 2,700 babies are murdered in the womb through abortion using 1 million abortions a year as a baseline. It is past time to attack the evil of murdering babies within the womb on every front with every legal weapon we can use until the murder of babies within the womb is abolished completely throughout the United States and its territories. Murder of babies within the womb is a horrendous evil that needs to and must be terminated.





“ACTION ALERT: Designate the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization

From: Act for America
February 28, 2017

‘ … the Muslim Brotherhood is the oldest Islamic terrorist organization in the world, and has served as the mothership for radical jihadists for almost a century.”

“ … two bills affirming that the Muslim Brotherhood be designated as a foreign terrorist entity have been reintroduced in the 115th Congress, we must once again take advantage of our influence on Capitol Hill and let our elected officials know how strongly we feel about the necessity of this designation.

Please call and/or send our pre-written email to your elected officials, and tell them to support the passage of The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act.

Call Your Representative Now

Email Your Representative Now

For Freedom,

ACT for America”

Legislative Action Center: https://cqrcengage.com/act/

Donate: https://actforamerica.nationbuilder.com/donate?utm_campaign=aalert&utm_medium=email&utm_source=actforamerica

The link: http://cqrcengage.com/act/app/onestep-write-a-letter?0&engagementId=276273

ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß

New Video on Muslim Brotherhood. Watch

UNMASKED: Brigitte Gabriel Exposes The Muslim Brotherhood

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0B-KUwpPj8&feature=youtu.be

Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý

Brigitte Gabriel on True Women’s Rights

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTkG6PKnNFw&feature=youtu.be




DEMAND FULL REPEAL of OBAMACARE

Petition: http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/demand-full-repeal-of-obamacare/


Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation

“Reality Check: No, Tomi, You Cannot Be Pro-Choice and Conservative

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsWXkIf-sYc


I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative


Isaiah 1: 1-31 (NIV)

The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem [Applicable to the United States today, in my opinion. GOD is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow. HE is righteous, just, and true yesterday, today, and tomorrow!] that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth! For the Lord has spoken: ‘I reared children and brought them up, but they have rebelled against me [The United States has and is rebelling against GOD!]. The ox knows its master, the donkey its owner’s manger, but Israel [the United States] does not know, my people [the United States] do not understand.’

Woe to the sinful nation [the United States], a people whose guilt is great, a brood of evildoers, children given to corruption! They have forsaken the Lord; they have spurned the Holy One of Israel [the United States] and turned their backs on him.

Why should you be beaten anymore? Why do you persist in rebellion? Your whole head is injured, your whole heart afflicted. From the sole of your foot to the top of your head there is no soundness—only wounds and welts and open sores, not cleansed or bandaged or soothed with olive oil.

Your country is desolate, your cities burned with fire; your fields are being stripped by foreigners right before you, laid waste as when overthrown by strangers. Daughter Zion is left like a shelter in a vineyard, like a hut in a cucumber field, like a city under siege. Unless the Lord Almighty had left us some survivors, we would have become like Sodom [destroyed by GOD because of homosexual sin!], we would have been like Gomorrah [destroyed by GOD because of homosexual sin!].

[Read Genesis 18 and 19 for the Biblical account. Genesis 19: 23-29 (NIV)]

“By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens. Thus he [GOD] overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities [A righteous act by a righteous GOD WHO destroyed evil people who refused to repent from their evil. And yes, I believe the account and so did JESUS the SON of GOD. HE referenced Sodom and/or Gomorrah several times. Matthew 10: 15 (NIV) “Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.”]—and also the vegetation in the land. But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.

Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the Lord. He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnace.

So when God destroyed the cities of the plain, he remembered Abraham, and he [GOD] brought Lot out of the catastrophe that overthrew the cities where Lot had lived.”

This is also why homosexual radicals attack Christians who speak out against homosexual behavior. Christians who know the Bible know that homosexual behavior is sin punishable by spiritual death. There is NO rightto homosexual behavior and people are NOT born homosexual. Homosexual behavior is learned behavior. Therefore, people do not have to be involved in the behavior and people can repent and STOP being involved in the behavior!]

Hear the word of the Lord, you rulers of Sodom [the United States]; listen to the instruction of our God, you people of Gomorrah [the United States]! ‘The multitude of your sacrifices—what are they to me?’ says the Lord. ‘I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals; I have no pleasure in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats. When you come to appear before me, who has asked this of you, this trampling of my courts? Stop bringing meaningless offerings! Your incense is detestable to me. New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations—I cannot bear your worthless assemblies. Your New Moon feasts and your appointed festivals I hate with all my being. They have become a burden to me; I am weary of bearing them. When you spread out your hands in prayer, I hide my eyes from you [the present or the future for the United States?]; even when you offer many prayers, I am not listening [the present or the future for the United States?].

Your hands are full of blood [the present for the United States as we as a nation MURDER over a million babies a year through government sanctioned abortions!]!

Wash and make yourselves clean [Will we?]. Take your evil deeds out of my sight [Will we?]; stop doing wrong [Will we?]. Learn to do right [Will we?]; seek justice [Will we?]. Defend the oppressed [Will we? Who are more oppressed than murdered babies?]. Take up the cause of the fatherless [Will we? GODS family structure not mans]; plead the case of the widow [Will we? GODS family structure not mans].’

‘Come now, let us settle the matter,’ says the Lord. ‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool. If you are willing and obedient [Stop rebelling], you will eat the good things of the land; but if you resist and rebel, you will be devoured by the sword.’ For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.

See how the faithful city has become a prostitute! She once was full of justice; righteousness used to dwell in her—but now murderers! Your silver has become dross, your choice wine is diluted with water. Your rulers are rebels, partners with thieves; they all love bribes and chase after gifts. They do not defend the cause of the fatherless; the widow’s case does not come before them.

Therefore the Lord, the Lord Almighty, the Mighty One of Israel, declares: ‘Ah! I will vent my wrath on my foes and avenge myself on my enemies. I will turn my hand against you; I will thoroughly purge away your dross and remove all your impurities. I will restore your leaders as in days of old, your rulers as at the beginning. Afterward you will be called the City of Righteousness, the Faithful City.’

Zion will be delivered with justice, her penitent ones with righteousness. But rebels and sinners will both be broken, and those who forsake the Lord will perish. ‘You will be ashamed because of the sacred oaks in which you have delighted; you will be disgraced because of the gardens that you have chosen. You will be like an oak with fading leaves, like a garden without water. The mighty man will become tinder and his work a spark; both will burn together, with no one to quench the fire.’”





After a contentious nomination process, the Senate affirmed the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the United States Supreme Court. With his appointment, the Supreme Court now has all nine members. A website article dealing with the appointment and approval. 

http://www.lifenews.com/2017/04/07/senate-confrirms-supreme-court-nominee-neil-gorsuch-over-democrat-and-pro-abortion-opposition/

“Senate Confirms Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch Over Democrat and Pro-Abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Opposition
Steven Ertelt | April 7, 2017

The Senate voted today to confirm Judge Neil Gorsuch’s Supreme Court nomination despite strenuous opposition from pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] groups like Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] and a filibuster [A short lived and meaningless filibuster since the Republicans changed the rules to end the filibuster as had the Left in previous sessions when the Left controlled the Senate.] from pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Democrats.

Senators voted 54-45 for Gorsuch with a few Democrats voting with all Republicans for his nomination. Manchin of West Virginia, Donnelly of Indiana, and Heitkamp of North Dakota joined Republicans [As would happen, all three of these Leftist Senators are up for reelection in 2018. A vote obviously designed to help them win reelection.].

Yesterday, Republicans successfully used the so-called nuclear option to set up the vote today on Gorsuch. The vote to employ the nuclear option and change the number of votes needed to cut off debate [End the filibuster. Normally under the filibuster rule, it takes 60 votes to end the debate. The change allowed a simple majority vote to end it.] and move to approve a Supreme Court nominee from 60 to a simple majority came after Democrats successfully filibustered the nomination.

Most Senate Democrats voted Thursday to block the nomination while all Republicans voted for cloture [The term for ending the debate.]. Then the Senate voted 52-48 to eliminate the 60-vote threshold to end debate and proceed to a vote.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called the opposition against Gorsuch a ‘radical move,’ and an unprecedented bipartisan [Which Republicans were involved in the filibuster?] filibuster of a high-court nominee who has been praised as well qualified for the job [When appointed to the Appellate Court, he was unanimously approved. Did he because a poor jurist while on the Appellate Court?].

‘But then again, this isn’t really about the nominee,’ McConnell said. ‘The opposition to this particular nominee is more about the man that nominated him and the party he represents than the nominee himself [Actually, it is about how he would vote on particular issues before the court. The questioning betrays the Left. They are not concerned with his adherence to the Constitution. They are concerned with how he will vote on particular issues that come before him. The Left is always agenda oriented. Their agenda does not include adhering to the Constitution.].’

With only 55 votes for cloture, Republicans then employed the nuclear option after defeating delaying votes to adjourn.

SUPPORT PRO-LIFE NEWS! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation during our Spring fundraising campaign

After today’s Senate vote, pro-life groups applauded Gorsuch’s confirmation.

National Right to Life called the vote the ‘the capstone on the yesterday’s landmark victory, when united Senate Republicans put an end to the ability of Senate Democrats to utilize the filibuster to deny confirmation to Supreme Court nominees of Republican presidents [During President Obamas eight years in office, every judge who was voted on was approved. I dont remember any filibusters. If there were any, they were not successful.].’

‘McConnell’s successful ‘nuclear’ motion produced a historic victory for Senate Republicans, the President, and the country—and a huge defeat for a coalition of left-wing groups, led by the abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] lobby, that had relentlessly pressured Democratic senators to filibuster the confirmation of Judge Gorsuch,’ said National Right to Life Senior Policy Advisor Douglas D. Johnson. ‘For decades, liberal senators and interest groups had attacked Republican judicial nominees with procedural and political weapons that Republicans were slow to match [Never did match.]. This week, the Republicans took decisive action to restore parity to the judicial confirmation process, and we commend them for it.’

National Right to Life President Carol Tobias added, ‘All too often, our efforts to protect unborn children and other vulnerable humans have been overridden by judges who believe they have a right to impose their own policy preferences [Known as judicial activism and used primarily by agenda driven Leftist judges.]. Judge Gorsuch appears to believe that judges are constrained to enforce the text and original intent of constitutional provisions [Which is how judges are suppose to rule.], and on all other matters should defer to democratically elected lawmakers—this heartens us, and alarms those who have relied on activist judges to impose their radical pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] policies [Judicial activism goes well beyond murdering babies within the womb. It is the most immoral of all the judicial activism but certainly not the only issue where judicial activism occurs.].’

AUL [Americans United for Life] Acting President Clarke Forsythe commended the Senate Republican leadership ‘for changing the Senate rules to confirm a judge who is committed to preserving self-government through the rule of law. Judge Neil Gorsuch’s exemplary record shows his commitment to constitutional originalism [Following the Constitution as originally written and intended which is the only correct way to rule on a case.], the separation of governmental powers, and principles of judicial restraint, which makes him the right person to weigh the contentious issues that will come before him.’

Forsythe continued: ‘The issue of abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] perfectly illustrates how judicial overreach can negatively change a nation: in Roe v. Wade a handful of Supreme Court Justices [Seven in total. Five of whom were appointed by Republican Presidents. Can not always determine an originalist by his perceived party label.] ignored constitutional text and history and acted without any reliable medical evidence to force a dramatic social change they favored [Rewrote the Constitution by judicial fiat.]. We hope, as pro-life Americans, that Judge Gorsuch will one day be part of a majority of justices who will admit that the Court has failed as the National Abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Control Board and will return this issue to the American people and their elective representatives in the States [He seems not to know the Constitution. If life is protected by Amendment V in relation to the federal government and it is; then, life is also protected by Amendment XIV in relation to the States. The States can not allow the murder of a baby within the womb. Furthermore, Congress can end the murder of babies within the womb. It does not need the reversal of previous court decisions by the Supreme Court.].’

[History of the nomination process for Neil Gorsuch]

Leading up to the vote, pro-life organizations called on Senators to support Gorsuch.

‘Democrat Senators, urged on by the extreme pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] lobby led by NARAL [National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League] Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood], will filibuster Judge Gorsuch. Gorsuch has been widely hailed as an incredibly qualified Supreme Court nominee and previously received unanimous support when confirmed to the Tenth Circuit,’ said Mallory Quigley of the SBA [Susan B. Anthony] List before the vote.’ To overcome this obstructionism, Senate Majority Leader McConnell will be forced to invoke the constitutional option.’

‘Pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] ideologues like Senator Schumer who have stood in the way of Gorsuch’s confirmation and urged others to do so will only cause political hurt for vulnerable Democrats up for re-election in 2018 [Why three of them voted for his appointment.],’ she added.

‘I thank President Donald Trump for nominating a man of such stellar credentials for the Supreme Court. I urge Democrats to put aside their animosity and come together to confirm Neil Gorsuch without forcing the Republicans to change the rules,’ added Operation Rescue President Troy Newman.

Americans United for Life Acting President Clarke Forsythe said: ‘An examination of Judge Gorsuch’s record reveals a jurist who carefully considers the laws and facts before reaching a legal judgment. That kind of measured respect for the Constitution was absolutely absent when an activist Supreme Court combined Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton to wipe out every abortion [murder of a baby within the womb]-related law in the country, establishing the Supreme Court as a National Abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Control Board. As a result, a rarely monitored, highly secretive, and very lucrative abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] industry was able to operate in ways harmful and even deadly for women and their unborn children.’

In a letter sent to the Senate, Forsythe recommended confirmation of Judge Gorsuch, especially in light of his commitment to the original public meaning of the Constitution. Forsythe wrote that the judge’s statements made during the 2006 Senate confirmation hearing that led to his unanimous confirmation to the Tenth Circuit, were a sign of his respect for the separation of powers, which keeps the branches of government in check. Gorsuch then stated, ‘Judges must allow the elected branches of government to flourish and citizens, through their elected representatives, to make laws appropriate to the facts and circumstances of the day. Judges must avoid the temptation to usurp the roles of the legislative and executive branches and must appreciate the advantages these democratic institutions have in crafting and adapting social policy as well as their special authority derived from the consent and mandate of the people, to do so.’

During three days of questioning, Gorsuch made it clear that he does not consider Roe v. Wade a “super precedent” that cannot be overturned [Where is asuper precedentin the Constitution? Come to think of it, where is precedent in the Constitution?]. He also defended his role in cases supporting the religious Liberties of Little Sisters of the Poor and Hobby Lobby and their attempts to stop the Obama Administration from forcing them to pay for abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] drugs for their employees.

Gorsuch also defended his opposition to assisted suicide—saying that it is not appropriate to intentionally take the life of another human being [Duh.].

During their questioning over the course of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Democrats repeatedly questioned Gorsuch about abortion and those religious liberty cases [Issues and the agenda are important. Adhering to the Constitution is not.].

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to approve the Gorsuch nomination, but Democrats have signaled their intent to filibuster the nomination on the senate floor. Here is more on what to expect:

‘Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced his expected plans to vote ‘no’ on Judge Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court and promised that Republicans would have to overcome a Democratic filibuster in order to seat him.

‘I have come to a decision after careful deliberation [Right. He knew from the beginning that he was not going to support the nomination.]. I have concluded [Months ago before judge Gorsuch was even nominated.] that I cannot support Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court,’ the New York Democrat said Thursday.

Schumer went on to say that Gorsuch will have to overcome a ‘cloture vote’ and ‘earn his confirmation.’

The Democratic leader was referencing a planned Democratic filibuster that will require Republicans to persuade eight Democrats to vote in favor of his nomination in order to reach the 60-vote threshold required to shut down a filibuster.

Schumer said Republicans pushing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, to change the Senate rules to allow a simple, 51-vote majority to confirm high court nominees are misguided.’

When he was Senate leader, Harry Reid changed the rules to required just 51 votes for a Supreme Court nominee and Republicans are expected to follow suit if necessary.

The head of one pro-life group told LifeNews the Democrats’ decision to filibuster is wrongheaded.

Anne Fox, President of Massachusetts Citizens for Life, said ‘Judge Gorsuch will do what a Supreme Court justice is supposed to do: interpret the law [Is this correct?], not make it [Is this correct?]. He knows that laws are to be made by legislative bodies, not courts. He is eminently well-qualified. Petty partisan politics should not get in the way of such an important appointment.’

Olivia Gans Turner, President of the Virginia Society for Human Life, added that Gorsuch ‘is man of integrity and deserves to be supported by the Senate of the United States.’

She said Democrats ‘need to do the right thing and vote to support Judge Gorsuch.’

President Donald Trump nominated the federal appeals Court Judge with strong support from pro-life organizations that point to his track record as supporting religious freedom for pro-life organizations refusing to be forced to pay for abortions. They also noted his opposition to assisted suicide and his support for a state fighting to defund Planned Parenthood abortion business.

The Planned Parenthood abortion business was also quick toblast Judge Gorsuch as well.

The abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] giant slammed Gorsuch for supporting Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor in their bids to not be forced to pay for abortion [murder of a baby within the womb]-causing drugs in their employee health care plans.

‘Gorsuch has also worked to undermine access to essential health care—ruling that bosses [Owners of the business] should be able to deny women birth control coverage [The issue was not birth control drugs. The issue was abortion inducing drugs that murdered a baby within the womb AFTER conception. The Left are such liars.]. His record shows a disturbing willingness to let ideology [Seriously? The Left is ideology driven.] overrule his constitutional duty to uphold and respect clearly established precedent [Notice precedent rather than following the Constitution. The precedent referenced was an unconstitutional rewrite of the Constitution.] protecting our fundamental liberties [There is NO liberty to murder ones own child within the womb. Such liars.], including Roe v. Wade and Whole Womans Health,’ Planned Parenthood said.

The 49-year-old Judge Gorsuch, if confirmed, would replace pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia—who supporting overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing states to once again provide legal protection for unborn children [It is the federal governments responsibility to protect life not the States. Amendment XIV declares that States can not deprive a person of life without due process and equal protection of the law. No child murdered within the womb has ever received due process and equal protection as required by the Constitution.].

Justice Gorsuch is currently a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which includes the districts of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, as well as the Eastern, Northern and Western districts of Oklahoma. He has served as a federal judge since August 2006 and was appointed by President George W. Bush and confirmed unanimously by the Senate.

The pro-life legal scholars who know him best say he is a strong originalist, believing that the Constitution should only be interpreted as the Founding Fathers intended. That would him squarely in the legal camp of Justice Scalia.

One of the biggest problems pro-life advocates have with the Supreme Court is that it invented a so-called right [Murder is not a right] to abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] in Roe v. Wade. But Gorsuch’s writings indicate he opposes that kind of thinking. In a 2005 National Review article, Gorsuch wrote that liberals [Leftists] rely on the courts too much to made social policy [It is the primary way the Left changes policy and it is ALL done unconstitutionally.].

‘This overweening addiction to the courtroom as the place to debate social policy is bad for the country and bad for the judiciary. In the legislative arena, especially when the country is closely divided, compromises tend to be the rule the day. But when judges rule this or that policy unconstitutional, there’s little room for compromise: One side must win, the other must lose. In constitutional litigation, too, experiments and pilot programs—real-world laboratories in which ideas can be assessed on the results they produce—are not possible. Ideas are tested only in the abstract world of legal briefs and lawyers arguments. As a society, we lose the benefit of the give-and-take of the political process and the flexibility of social experimentation that only the elected branches can provide [What happens is judicial tyranny.].’

He said liberal [Leftist] activists rely on the judicial system ‘as the primary means of effecting their social agenda on everything from gay marriage to assisted suicide to the use of vouchers for private-school education.’

On direct pro-life matters, Gorsuch sided with the state of Utah in its attempt to defund the Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] business.

Gorsuch sided with pro-life Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s effort to defund Planned Parenthood. After his decision, the 10th Circuit Court decided against re-hearing Planned Parenthood v. Gary Herbert, after the court previously ordered Utah to fund Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood]. Gorsch dissented in the case and wrote:

‘Respectfully, this case warrants rehearing. As it stands, the panel opinion leaves litigants in preliminary injunction disputes reason to worry that this court will sometimes deny deference to district court factual findings; relax the burden of proof by favoring attenuated causal claims our precedent disfavors; and invoke arguments for reversal untested by the parties, unsupported by the record, and inconsistent with principles of comity. Preliminary injunction disputes like this one recur regularly and ensuring certainty in the rules governing them, and demonstrating that we will apply those rules consistently to all matters that come before us, is of exceptional importance to the law, litigants, lower courts, and future panels alike. I respectfully dissent.’

As National Review pro-life legal scholar Ed Whelan notes:

‘I’d like to take note of his remarkable failure to acknowledge, much less credit Gorsuch for, Gorsuch’s powerful dissent (see pp. 16-27 here) one month ago from the Tenth Circuit’s denial of rehearing en banc in Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Herbert. As the faithful reader will recall from these posts of mine, in the aftermath of the Center for Medical Progress’s release of videos depicting various Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] affiliates’ ugly involvement in harvesting body parts, Utah governor Gary Herbert directed state agencies ‘to cease acting as an intermediary for pass-through federal funds’ to Planned Parenthood’s [Planned Murderhoods] Utah affiliate. But after the district court denied Planned Parenthood’s [Planned Murderhoods] request for a preliminary injunction against Herbert’s directive, a divided panel, on very weak reasoning, ruled that Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] was entitled to a preliminary injunction. Gorsuch’s dissent dismantles the panel majority’s reasoning.’

Would a Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch be inclined to overturn the decades-old decision fostering abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] on demand? His record suggests he is open to doing so.

As one pro-life legal scholar notes:

‘In the panel ruling in Games-Perez, Gorsuch did indeed regard himself as bound to abide by controlling circuit precedent, just as nearly every circuit judge not named Stephen Reinhardt also does. But Gorsuch didn’t stop there. In a 20-page opinion, he urged the en banc Tenth Circuit to reconsider and overrule the wrong precedent.’

Gorsuch also has made pro-life comments about abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] and strongly opposes assisted suicide. He has written a book, The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, which (as Princeton University Press puts it) ‘builds a nuanced, novel, and powerful moral and legal argument against legalization (of assisted suicide and euthanasia), one based on a principle that, surprisingly, has largely been overlooked in the debate—the idea that human life is intrinsically valuable and that intentional killing is always wrong [Duh].’

Meanwhile, as National Review reports, ‘Gorsuch wrote a powerful dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc in a case involving funding of Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood].’ NR indicates Gorsuch has written ‘human life is fundamentally and inherently valuable, and that the intentional taking of human life by private persons is always wrong.’

Democrats have already promised to filibuster any Supreme Court nominee.

Senator Jeff Merkle, a pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Oregon Democrat, said in an interview on Monday morning that he will filibuster any pick other than pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] Judge Merrick garland [sic]—who pro-abortion [murder of a baby within the womb] president Barack Obama named to replace pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia.

‘This is a stolen seat [Typical Leftist lie that has NO constitutional basis.]. This is the first time a Senate majority has stolen a seat,’ Merkley said in an interview. ‘We will use every lever in our power to stop this.’

Gorsuch is 49 years old. He and his wife, Louise, have two daughters and live in Boulder, Colorado.

The reason why federal court appointments have become so important is because Congress has failed in its constitutional duty and responsibility to hold federal court judges accountable. If Congress would hold judges accountable the vast power the judges have accumulated would be ended. Federal judges have been tyrannically controlling the destiny of the United States for decades. It needs to end.

And it can be ended. However, the appointment of one originalist will not end it. Congress MUST hold federal judges accountable.

A brief quiz on the Constitution:

1) What Article, Section, Paragraph within the United States Constitution gives the federal courts the power to interpret the Constitution of the United States?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

2) What are the constitutional qualifications for individuals appointed to the federal courts?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

3) What is the constitutional term of office for individuals appointed to the federal courts?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________


Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation

For Life, for liberty

Don L. Vance

“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.