Vote Vance 2016: June 2017

Friday, June 30, 2017

The Supreme Court, the Constitution, Private Property Rights, and Governments

Four of the seven Morton, Illinois District 709 School Board members voted to support transsexual sexual delusions. The “Four Pretenders” are:

Shaun Bill elected term ended in 2017. He is off the school board.

Clint Heinold elected term ended in 2017. He is off the school board.

Kelly Scarfe elected term ended in 2017. She is off the school board.

Michelle Bernier elected term ends in 2019. [Will she run for reelection after the results of the 2017 election?]

Board decisions have consequences. Elections have consequences.

Note: [ ] = my additions

Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 44 years ago as of January 22, 2017

Over 44 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. Evil personified!

ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß
Five months after the 44th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, approximately 413,699 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the murders continue day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children?
Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý Ý

Petition: http://nationalprolifealliance.com/lacAM_petition.aspx?pid=0219&npla=EH17

Abolishing the murder of babies within the womb by Congressional law will actually be faster and more effective than waiting on the court. Right now there are five justices on the court who support the murder of babies within the womb. The four radical Leftist justices appointed by Democrat Presidents and Justice Kennedy. Therefore, to even have a chance of the court reversing, we need one more Constitutional Justice and the one appointed has to replace one of the five pro-murdering babies within the womb justices. Even then, it would take a couple of years, at least, to get the case through the court system.

Passing a law of Congress is the best way of ending the terror of our American holocaust. The best way to abolish the murder of babies within the womb. The best way to stop any State from passing a law allowing the murder of babies within the womb. And it is also best constitutionally.

Life for all persons within the United States including babies within the womb is guaranteed and protected by the Declaration of Independence, Amendment V of the United States Constitution, and Amendment XIV of the United States Constitution. No court, no government body, no individual can constitutionally sanction the murder of babies within the womb. All such decisions, laws, and regulations are patently unconstitutional and illegal and should be immediately abolished by Congress by law!

Statistically, everyday of delay over 2,700 babies are murdered in the womb through abortion using 1 million abortions a year as a baseline. It is past time to attack the evil of murdering babies within the womb on every front with every legal weapon we can use until the murder of babies within the womb is abolished completely throughout the United States and its territories. Murder of babies within the womb is a horrendous evil that needs to and must be terminated.

Sign the petition to Secretary Price to help put an end to taxpayer funding of Planned Murderhood.

Click here to sign the petition.

http://www.stopp.org/price-petition/

No organization that murders babies within the womb and/or supports and promotes the same should ever receive federal government money either directly or indirectly.

The latest released video exposing Planned Murderhood and the murder of babies within the womb industry:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq1ycCmX3uU

Above video was removed by youtube as it censors video that is in opposition to its LEFTIST agenda.

New link to the video:

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=746_1495760241

This one has now been removed too. What does the murder of babies within the womb industry fear? The truth and the truth getting out to the world. No better proof than this censorship.

Newer link to the video:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/i-need-4-intact-limbs-planned-parenthood-abortionists-describe-beheading-ri

As of 1PM CDT Saturday 5/27/2017 the video is at this link. I do not know how long it will remain. I am listening to it as I write.

As of 3:33AM CDT Sunday 5/28/2017 the video has been removed.

“Sorry
This video does not exist.”

Censorship by the Left reigns supreme in the United States of America.

My post on the judge who censored the videos: https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/06/abortion-california-federal-judge-and.html

Order given by federal judge William Orrick who was appointed by President Barack Hussein Obama.

Preview The Center for Medical Progress

Petition to Defund Planned Murderhood NOW!: https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/congress-must-de-fund-planned-parenthood-immediately.html

NO organization, including Planned Murderhood, which is involved in any way with the sinful, evil, barbaric practice of murdering babies within the womb should ever receive our taxpayer money!

The lies of Planned Murderhood supporters and promoters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJjSPsVuS8g&feature=youtu.be&utm_source=Live+Action&utm_campaign=456b90d2cd-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b50982edcd-456b90d2cd-86729901

DEMAND FULL REPEAL of OBAMACARE

Petition: http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/demand-full-repeal-of-obamacare/

Petition to defund the United Nations:

http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/defund-the-united-nations-h/

The UN is a completely failed organization. It needs to be defunded.

¨ For its attacks on the sovereign State of Israel,
¨ For its promotion of and support for murdering babies within the womb and the radical homosexual agenda.
¨ For supporting and promoting the scientific nonsense of man-made global warming,
¨ And for its call for one world government in direct violation of the sovereignty of the United States of America.

¨ Then, the US needs to get out of the UN and get the UN out of the US.

Please call and/or send our pre-written email to your elected officials, and tell them to support the passage of The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act.

Call Your Representative Now

Email Your Representative Now

Legislative Action Center: https://cqrcengage.com/act/

The link: http://cqrcengage.com/act/app/onestep-write-a-letter?0&engagementId=276273

A brief quiz on the Constitution:

1) What Article, Section, Paragraph within the United States Constitution gives the federal courts the power to interpret the Constitution of the United States?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

2) What are the constitutional qualifications for individuals appointed to the federal courts?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

3) What is the constitutional term of office for individuals appointed to the federal courts?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation

I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative

Isaiah 1: 1-31 (NIV)

The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem [Applicable to the United States today, in my opinion. GOD is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow. HE is righteous, just, and true yesterday, today, and tomorrow!] that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth! For the Lord has spoken: ‘I reared children and brought them up, but they have rebelled against me [The United States has and is rebelling against GOD!]. The ox knows its master, the donkey its owner’s manger, but Israel [the United States] does not know, my people [the United States] do not understand.’

Woe to the sinful nation [the United States], a people whose guilt is great, a brood of evildoers, children given to corruption! They have forsaken the Lord [the United States]; they have spurned the Holy One of Israel [the United States] and turned their backs on him [the United States] .

Why should you be beaten anymore? Why do you persist in rebellion? Your whole head is injured, your whole heart afflicted. From the sole of your foot to the top of your head there is no soundness—only wounds and welts and open sores, not cleansed or bandaged or soothed with olive oil.

Your country is desolate, your cities burned with fire; your fields are being stripped by foreigners right before you, laid waste as when overthrown by strangers. Daughter Zion is left like a shelter in a vineyard, like a hut in a cucumber field, like a city under siege. Unless the Lord Almighty had left us some survivors, we would have become like Sodom [destroyed by GOD because of homosexual sin!], we would have been like Gomorrah [destroyed by GOD because of homosexual sin!].

[Read Genesis 18 and 19 for the Biblical account. Genesis 19: 23-29 (NIV)]

“By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens. Thus he [GOD] overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities [A righteous act by a righteous GOD WHO destroyed evil people who refused to repent from their evil. And yes, I believe the account and so did JESUS the SON of GOD. HE referenced Sodom and/or Gomorrah several times. Matthew 10: 15 (NIV) “Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.”]—and also the vegetation in the land. But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.

Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the Lord. He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnace.

So when God destroyed the cities of the plain, he remembered Abraham, and he [GOD] brought Lot out of the catastrophe that overthrew the cities where Lot had lived.”

This is also why homosexual radicals attack Christians who speak out against homosexual behavior. Christians who know the Bible know that homosexual behavior is sin punishable by spiritual death. There is NO “right” to homosexual behavior and people are NOT born homosexual. Homosexual behavior is learned behavior. Therefore, people do not have to be involved in the behavior and people can repent and STOP being involved in the behavior!]

Hear the word of the Lord, you rulers of Sodom [the United States]; listen to the instruction of our God, you people of Gomorrah [the United States]! ‘The multitude of your sacrifices—what are they to me?’ says the Lord. ‘I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals; I have no pleasure in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats. When you come to appear before me, who has asked this of you, this trampling of my courts? Stop bringing meaningless offerings! Your incense is detestable to me. New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations—I cannot bear your worthless assemblies. Your New Moon feasts and your appointed festivals I hate with all my being. They have become a burden to me; I am weary of bearing them. When you spread out your hands in prayer, I hide my eyes from you [the present or the future for the United States?]; even when you offer many prayers, I am not listening [the present or the future for the United States?].

Your hands are full of blood [the present for the United States as we as a nation MURDER over a million babies a year through government sanctioned abortions!]!

Wash and make yourselves clean [Will we?]. Take your evil deeds out of my sight [Will we?]; stop doing wrong [Will we?]. Learn to do right [Will we?]; seek justice [Will we?]. Defend the oppressed [Will we? Who are more oppressed than murdered babies?]. Take up the cause of the fatherless [Will we? GOD’S family structure not man’s]; plead the case of the widow [Will we? GOD’S family structure not man’s].’

‘Come now, let us settle the matter,’ says the Lord. ‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool. If you are willing and obedient [Stop rebelling], you will eat the good things of the land; but if you resist and rebel, you will be devoured by the sword.’ For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.

See how the faithful city has become a prostitute! She once was full of justice; righteousness used to dwell in her—but now murderers! Your silver has become dross, your choice wine is diluted with water. Your rulers are rebels, partners with thieves; they all love bribes and chase after gifts. They do not defend the cause of the fatherless; the widow’s case does not come before them.

Therefore the Lord, the Lord Almighty, the Mighty One of Israel, declares: ‘Ah! I will vent my wrath on my foes and avenge myself on my enemies. I will turn my hand against you; I will thoroughly purge away your dross and remove all your impurities. I will restore your leaders as in days of old, your rulers as at the beginning. Afterward you will be called the City of Righteousness, the Faithful City.’

Zion will be delivered with justice, her penitent ones with righteousness. But rebels and sinners will both be broken, and those who forsake the Lord will perish. ‘You will be ashamed because of the sacred oaks in which you have delighted; you will be disgraced because of the gardens that you have chosen. You will be like an oak with fading leaves, like a garden without water. The mighty man will become tinder and his work a spark; both will burn together, with no one to quench the fire.’”

Another murder of babies within the womb factory closes UPDATE:

http://www.lifenews.com/2017/06/26/planned-parenthood-permanently-closes-another-abortion-clinic-in-new-jersey/

“Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] Permanently Closes Another Abortion [Murder of babies within the womb] Clinic in New Jersey
Steven Ertelt Jun 26, 2017

The Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] abortion [Murder of babies within the womb] business has closed another clinic, this time in New Jersey. In recent weeks the Planned Parenthood abortion company has closed several abortion clinics nationwide. This brings the national total up to 17 this year.”

http://www.lifenews.com/2017/05/31/planned-parenthood-to-close-three-abortion-clinics-in-california/

“Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] to Close Three Abortion [Murder of babies within the womb] Clinics in California
Micaiah Bilger | May 31, 2017

“Three more Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] abortion [murder of babies within the womb] facilities will close this summer in California, bringing the national total up to 16.

The abortion [murder of babies within the womb] chain has announced quite a few facility closings across the country already this year, including four in Iowa, two in Pennsylvania, one in Maryland, three in New Mexico, one in Wyoming and two in Colorado.

This week, Californians for Life confirmed that the Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] abortion [murder of babies within the womb] clinics in Vacaville, Pittsburg and central Richmond are slated to close on June 30. All three are located in northern California; they did abortions [murders of babies within the womb] on unborn babies up to 10 weeks.”

Planned Murderhood does not provide healthcare video:

https://www.facebook.com/liveaction/videos/10155273054558728/?utm_source=Live+Action&utm_campaign=cb5b583ece-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b50982edcd-cb5b583ece-86729901

“Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] says it needs hundreds of millions in taxpayer funding to help pregnant women. Yet when moms need prenatal care, ultrasounds, and adoption services, Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] turns them away and tells them to ‘Google it.’ How is the abortion [murder of babies within the womb] giant using our tax dollars [Over half a billion dollars of federal money in the last fiscal year and funded by a Republican Congress through the 2016-2017 fiscal year that ends September 30, 2017.]?”

Video: “Pregnant women call Planned Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] to hear about their options”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acb1KUESU6M

Donate to Live Action: https://donate.liveaction.org/checkout/donation?eid=125628&utm_source=lan&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=live_action_news&utm_content=side_ad_square

Bonus video: The advantages of a Harvard education and being a Leftist:

https://crtxnews.com/lighter-side-just-cant-make-stuff-female-millennial-snowflake-comes-unglued-white-male-patriarchy/

UNBELIEVABLE! She needs to go back to Harvard? No wait, Harvard obviously did not do a thing to educate this individual to the realities of the real world.

Is this the future for the United States?

UPDATE #2:

The Senate has postponed the vote on “Trumpcare,” “Mitchcare,” “RINOcare,” “Ryancare,” “Obamacare-lite,” whatever one wants to name the abysmal lie of the Republicans repealing Obamacare until after the July 4th holiday recess. It seems they lack the votes to jam this monstrousity2 down the throats of the American people, at this time.

From: The Convention of States Team
June 27, 2017

“Republicans talk a big game on the campaign trail, but the last few months have made it clear that they have no intention of delivering on their promises.

The federal foray into healthcare has been a disaster. But rather than learning from their mistakes and moving on, the GOP is doubling-down on the federal takeover of America’s health decisions [Decisions that are OUR decisions NOT the federal government’s. Decisions that are OUR decisions NOT the federal government’s. Decisions that are OUR decisions NOT the federal government’s. Tyranny from Republicans is just as bad, if not worse, than tyranny from the Left.].”

Both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment protect the property rights of those covered by the Constitution. Almost certainly, the Fourteen Amendment has been the most misused and abused Amendment in relation to unconstitutional and unjustifiable decisions by Leftists in the federal court system. Both the decision to sanction the murder of babies within the womb and the series of decisions related to radical homosexual behavior have been based upon a radical distortion of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decisions created “rights” that do not exist and can not be found anywhere within the Constitution and its Amendments. In perverse, reverse decisions, property rights which are absolutely protected within both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments have been trampled upon by the very same federal courts. Proving beyond any doubt that Leftist federal court judges have total disregard for the Constitution as writing and amended.

The major court decision that allowed the illegal and unconstitutional taking of private property by governments was Kelo vs. City of New London. I am not going into the case with this post except to say that the court changed the “public use” phrase into “public purpose,” which is a vastly different application of the Amendment and which can mean almost anything the court wants it to mean. Also, President Trump, not being knowledgeable about the Constitution, has said he approves of this decision. A summary of the Leftist’s court decision is here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-108.ZS.html

The deciding judges in the 5-4 decision were the usual Leftist suspects. This decision occurred before the two Obama Leftist appointments. The judges were:

John Paul Stevens (now retired. Replaced by an Obama appointment.), associate justice
Anthony M. Kennedy, associate justice
David H. Souter (now retired. Replaced by an Obama appointment.), associate justice
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, associate justice
Stephen G. Breyer, associate justice

In a new decision, the court recently further trampled down private property rights for the benefit of government. Here are the relevant portions of the Fifth and Fourteen Amendments:

Amendment V
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Amendment XIV Section 1
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/supreme-court-okays-uncompensated-regulatory-takings-massive-blow-private-property?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpZeVpERXhaR1F6WW1aayIsInQiOiJ4V05Ya2d6UmE5WmQ0T2xiS1FLXC9zRmtcL3ZkQ1RPWlh5MW5pczFQcllBU0NJRGpXcEJEcW5RRThJSEVYUmt3eDJSZlpOQVBmRWFXK1RjaGRkMVFZYUVkK2dDV0xRYXU2d3NsSWU2S01UZ0NMU3c0Uk5jQ2hSZEwwUlhaOUduSWhtIn0%3D

“This Recent SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the United States] Ruling Is a HUGE Blow Against Property Rights
P. Gardner Goldsmith | June 27, 2017

Just as Autumn brings ‘hunting season’ for many people, June delivers ‘SCOTUS Season,’ that glorious time when we find out from one branch of the oppressive U.S. government how many more of our rights it will ‘allow’ the other branches to take. And on June 23, SCOTUS didn’t disappoint.

In the case of Murr v Wisconsin, five SCOTUS justices saw fit to reinforce the troubling idea that government busybodies can pass regulations and zoning laws that utterly destroy the value, and highly restrict the peaceful use, of one’s [own, private] land [Can you guess the five judges who made this determination? Of course you can, if you follow the federal courts. The Leftist five.].

[page 4 of https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-214_f1gj.pdf

Anthony M. Kennedy, associate justice who wrote the opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, associate justice
Stephen G. Breyer, associate justice
Sonia Sotomayor, associate justice
Elena Kagan, associate justice

“Neil Gorsuch [The just appointed Justice.] took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.”]

The case against the state of Wisconsin was brought by Donna Murr and her siblings, who inherited two parcels of land purchased in the ‘60s by their parents—land that lies adjacent to the St. Croix River in Wisconsin. Their parents built a cabin on one parcel, and kept the other unimproved, to serve as an investment for their kids.

As Eric Boehm writes for Reason, the siblings attempted to sell the unimproved land as a way to pay for renovations to the cabin. But state regulations enacted in the 1980s, which restricted the use of land along rivers, effectively prevented them from doing so. The value of their land, which had been appraised at $400,000 before the Murrs tried to put the parcel on the market, was reduced to $40,000 [Reduced by ten times the appraised value.], an offer made by the only entity that would buy it—the county government [Because government regulations made it basically worthless for private use.].

Naturally, this didn’t sit well with the owners [In effect, the government was stealing $360,000 from the family.].

Notes Boehm:

‘The Murrs filed a lawsuit against the state and county, arguing that they should be compensated for the lost value of the property, arguing the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees governments must compensate property owners when land is seized or otherwise made un-useful for public purposes [“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Notice the acceptance of “purposes” instead of “use” which was made necessary because of the Kelo ruling.].’

To complicate matters, the state offered the Murrs a ‘takings’ claim if they combined the two properties and sold them both, then figured out the loss on the overall package.

But the whole point of the Murrs’ interest in selling the second property was to help pay for renovations to the first, which they wanted to keep.

Justice seemed within reach when the Murrs finally got their day in front of the black robed oligarchs at SCOTUS [Can never be sure of receiving justice when before Leftist judges. Their agenda is much more important than your justice.].

The result? A massive blow against not only this innocent family who have been threatened by the state of Wisconsin, but also a callus dismissal of anyone who believes in the peaceful exchange of private property. The majority of justices found that Wisconsin was perfectly justified to lock down the Murr’s land with new regulations passed long after the land had been purchased. The SCOTUS ruled that the family did not even need to be compensated for the regulatory taking [Theft by government decree.].

This is a very big deal.

As Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his dissent:

‘Put simply, today’s decision knocks the definition of ‘private property’ loose from its foundation on stable state law rules [Government can destroy any private ownership situation through government regulation.] (…)’

And he is precisely right.

State interference in the peaceful use of your property is state interference in the fruits of your labor, hence interference in the management of your life. Just like a criminal neighbor who might threaten us, government regulations like these are immoral, unethical and stand opposed to the conception of self-ownership and peace.

Simply put, there is no difference between politicians telling you how to peacefully exchange property, and telling you who to date, not date, when, where, or how. The state is not a person, and selling land along a river does not harm another person. What harms people is government making land worthless through busybody laws and regulations—regulations about which, evidently, the majority in the Supreme Court care very, very little. [Carte blanche decision that government can do as it pleases in regard to private property without constitutional restraint. Scary. It is the advancement of the totalitarian State. Just what the Left wants.]”

The six fabricators in at least two of the three cases discussed:

The earlier cases: http://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/06/impeach-six-members-of-supreme-court.html and http://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/06/guns-homosexual-marriage-supreme-court.html

John G. Roberts, Jr., chief justice of the United States [Dissented in this current case.]
Anthony M. Kennedy, associate justice
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, associate justice
Stephen G. Breyer, associate justice
Sonia Sotomayor, associate justice
Elena Kagan, associate justice

IMPEACH them all.

This is not Constitutional interpretation. This is Constitutional fraud perpetrated against the American public and the United States Constitution. All six of these so-called justices ought to be impeached for violating their oath of office.

They will not be because Congress has shirked its constitutional duty of holding members of the federal courts accountable.

Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation

For Life, for liberty

Don L. Vance

“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Guns, Homosexual “Marriage,” the Supreme Court, Congress, and the Constitution

DEMAND FULL REPEAL of OBAMACARE

Petition: http://madisonproject.grassrootsaction.us/demand-full-repeal-of-obamacare/

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/scotus-just-made-a-mockery-of-biology-and-the-second-amendment

“SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the United States] just made a mockery of biology AND the Second Amendment
Daniel Horowitz | June 27, 2017

Some conservatives are hailing this week’s Supreme Court decisions as a victory for conservatives. Inasmuch as the contours of the cases before the Supreme Court have moved so far left and that the lower courts are so extreme, yes, we did win some partial victories. But don’t think for a minute we suddenly have a high court that believes in the Constitution [On the contrary, there are five members on the fraudulent supreme court who believe they are the Constitution. They practice the lie that “The Constitution says what the supreme court says it says.”]. In fact, there are only three justices who believe in science or the very natural law that defines fundamental rights, which we will celebrate on July 4 next week [The three Justices who actually try to uphold the Constitution as written and amended are Justices Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice; Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Associate Justice; and, so far, the newest court member Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice.].

The Supreme Court, once again, has contorted fundamental rights beyond belief [Beyond belief for any court that is actually trying to apply the Constitution as written and amended. For Leftist judges, unfortunately, it is the norm to “rewrite” the Constitution to advance the radical, controlling agenda of the Left. Congress has allowed them to get away with these fraudulent interpretations for years and years.]. When juxtaposing one decision with another case of inaction, it is clear that six members of the Supreme Court believe there is a fundamental right to force states to change biology and recognize birth certificates of ‘same-sex couples’ as if both parents physically conceived the child [Discussed yesterday here: https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/06/impeach-six-members-of-supreme-court.html ]. At the same time, gun owners cannot force states to abide by the most inalienable right of self-defense enshrined in the Constitution [The Second Amendment], even nine years after the Heller decision. It further demonstrates why the courts are irremediably broken [The courts are not irremediably broken. There are a number of ways given in the Constitution which allows for the courts to be reined in. It is up to Congress to hold the members of the courts accountable and responsible for their decisions. It is up to we the people to hold Congress responsible and accountable if they do not hold the courts accountable and responsible.]—a one-way street and a dead end for conservatives [I disagree. We need to get to work electing constitutional conservatives, regardless of party, to Congress and holding Congress accountable. This would be easier and better than trying to amend the Constitution by a Convention of States. The Constitution presently gives Congress the power to control the courts. Congress needs to use that power.].

Supreme Court ignores lower court breaking of Second Amendment

Over the past few years, we have chronicled a pattern developing in the lower courts on the Second Amendment since the Heller decision. Not that we needed the Supreme Court to affirm the right to self-defense, which predated the Constitution [It most certainly does. In the long term, only an armed people will ever be a free people. To take over a nation, tyrants must disarm the people and would be tyrants understand the truth of disarming the people. Even Leftist Hollywood understood this in the make-believe movie Red Dawn. Disarming the people is NEVER for the good of the people. NEVER.], but the Heller majority made it clear that the right to bear arms is complete and that it is not subject to an ‘interest balancing test’ by state governments [Actually, the Heller decision was a Washington D.C. case and Washington D.C. is not a State. The State case was two years later. Yes, I looked it up.].

[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

“District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5–4 decision that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home and that Washington, D.C.‘s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept ‘unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock’ violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.‘s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment’s protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states, which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.”]

Yet, unlike in the aftermath of Obergefell, when states just completely capitulated on gay marriage, Heller did not result in the clear right to bear arms, even though guns are mentioned in the Constitution and marriage is not [Guns have their own Constitutional Amendment. Marriage is not mentioned in the body of the Constitution or any amendment and therefore is LEFT COMPLETELY to the States constitutionally.]. Blue states continued to ban an array of common firearms, magazine capacities, and most importantly, the right to carry any firearm under any circumstance on one’s person. The Second, Third, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuit Courts [All Leftist controlled courts that promote an agenda rather than obeying the Constitution as written and amended.] have all upheld either the ‘assault weapons bans,’ the ban on carrying, or both.

And the Supreme Court has refused to take up these cases [The Leftists on the supreme court.]. Although one cannot always read too much into the Supreme Court’s decision not to grant an appeal on a major case, there is no other way to interpret the court’s endless indifference to the slaughtering of Heller and the most basic right. It takes four justices to grant certiorari, but clearly Chief Justice Roberts has refused to be that fourth vote over and over again. Justices Thomas and Scalia have consistently called out the other justices for not granting cert to appeals when lower courts clearly disregard Heller. In one instance, Alito did as well.

Today, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Peruta v. California, where the Ninth Circuit upheld the state’s ban on carrying any and all firearms, a clear violation of the most unambiguously crafted right. Justice Thomas dissented from the denial of cert, as he has done in the past, and was joined by Justice Gorsuch. He called the Ninth Circuit’s ruling ‘indefensible’:

‘As we explained in Heller, to ‘bear arms’ means to ‘‘wear, bear, or carry upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.’’ (…)

The most natural reading of this definition encompasses public carry. I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen [Duh!].’

Thomas goes on to note that the main idea behind the right to carry a firearm is the inalienable right to self-defense [Can’t defend yourself against a gun with a gun if you can not carry a gun. Criminals do not care what the law requires. If they want to carry and use a gun they will. Duh. The Left wants to deny law abiding citizens the right to protect themselves against evil men and women. The Left is the sponsor of death and murder. The Left protects criminals.] , which naturally applies most often outside one’s home. As Sam Adams, the founding father of the American Revolution, said, ‘(A)mong the natural rights of the colonists are these: First a right to life, secondly to liberty, and thirdly to property; together with the right to defend them in the best manner they can.’ Article I of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, by which the Declaration of Independence was inspired, lists the rights to ‘defending their lives and liberties’ as one of the inalienable rights we celebrate this coming week.

Justice Thomas laments that ‘the Court’s decision to deny certiorari in this case reflects a distressing trend: the treatment of the Second Amendment as a disfavored right [The Left would prefer it not to be a right at all.].’

In closing, he rebuked the other members of the court for indifference to fundamental rights that affect people’s security while they are protected by armed guards [The hypocrisy of the Left. Protection for me but not for thee.]:

‘For those of us who work in marbled halls, guarded constantly by a vigilant and dedicated police force, the guarantees of the Second Amendment might seem antiquated and superfluous. But the Framers made a clear choice: They reserved to all Americans the right to bear arms for self-defense [And for self-governance.] I do not think we should stand by idly while a State denies its citizens that right, particularly when their very lives may depend on it [Common sense and constitutional as well.].’

This decision accelerates the urgency for Republicans to push right-to-carry legislation, yet they will likely remain silent [In some States and given the current Congress at the federal level. In many conservative States it is being advanced and enacted.].

Courts become God and remake human sexuality

[Well, NO! They just think they can because they are arrogant AND because Congress has basically allowed the courts to do as they please instead of holding them accountable as prescribed in the Constitution. Congress could stop the courts’ lawlessness, if it had the will. Congress does not have the will to carryout its constitutional functions.]

So, while the courts ignore the most foundational and plainly written right in the Constitution [Second Amendment], which rights do they prioritize? The right to immigrate, the right to a gay [homosexual] marriage, the right to 30 days of early voting, etc.—in other words, rights that don’t exist [And never had existed and can’t exist because rights come from GOD not from man]. But this week the court took its obsession [Obsession is the correct word for this nonsense.] with gay [homosexual] marriage to a new level.

Although the court appears reluctant to defend its own majority opinion—on an incontrovertible right—from the lower courts, it jumped with alacrity to overturn the Arkansas Supreme Court, which upheld the state’s birth certificates, natural law, our core history and traditions … oh … and basic biology.

Not content with their ‘legal victory’ in forcing states to redefine marriage, the far Left has gotten the Supreme Court to redefine biology.

In Pavan v. Smith, the Supreme Court said that lesbian [homosexual] couples in which one woman is impregnated through artificial insemination are not only entitled to have both their names on the child’s birth certificate, the certificate must be as if the ‘husband’ of the duo is the actual biological ‘father’ of the child [Court insanity. They believe they can ignore basic biology and redefine words at their will. Nine unelected people are the supreme rulers of the United States? NOT! It is past time for Congress to hold federal court members accountable and responsible for their irresponsible decisions.].

No, really!

As is the case with all births from artificial insemination, Arkansas law recognizes the non-biological father on the birth certificate, governed by a different process from that for biological birth certificates. The state fully complied with the insane [Insane is the correct word for this decision.] Obergefell decision and recognized same-sex couples and indeed placed the second ‘mother’ on the birth certificate through the non-biological process. But the plaintiffs wanted them to be treated as identical to biological parents [Which is IMPOSSIBLE.]! This defies common sense [And reason and logic and the Constitution.]. As Justice Gorsuch put it in his dissent, a state has an interest in preserving the integrity of biological birth certificates, ‘ensuring government officials can identify public health trends and helping individuals determine their biological lineage, citizenship, or susceptibility to genetic disorders.’

Yet, six justices, including John Roberts, ruled that Obergefell demands that lesbian couples be treated the same as couples who could actually procreate and that they must be issued birth certificates as if they were the biological parents. Thus, they are decreeing that states must lie [And commit fraud.] about biology and act as if two women or two men can procreate.

So why can’t they procreate? Are the courts now going to sue God for violating Obergefell and not changing biology to comport with the capricious legal gymnastics of the court [If they could, they probably would.]?

This demonstrates how far this decrepit legal system will go to promote the homosexual agenda, to the point that they will alter the most immutable laws of nature to comport with their political beliefs [Agenda. It is all about advancing the agenda and the agenda is about controlling everything as all tyrants want to do.].

The juxtaposition of the views of these six justices towards gun rights with their views on bending biology for homosexual couples is earth-shattering. They take the most foundational self-evident truth of self-defense, codified in plain language in the Constitution, and toss it in the trash. Then they create a right never addressed in the Constitution, which is the most antithetical idea imaginable to the self-evident truths of nature and nature’s God—the source and foundation of inalienable rights we celebrate this time of year—and take it a step further to redefine human sexuality.

While some conservatives are celebrating the fact that the Supreme Court agreed to take up the Masterpiece case, wherein a Christian baker was forced to perform a service for a homosexual wedding, I wouldn’t be too confident in Roberts and Kennedy. Given that they are willing to erase the most immutable laws of nature to placate the sexual identity lobby, what’s some poor Christian baker in the scheme of things [I do not know of an instance when judge Kennedy did not vote on the homosexual side of any issue. Why would he start now?]?

The courts are irremediably broken [I disagree with this. The courts can be righted. It will take we the people demanding and requiring that Congress carry out its constitutional duties and responsibilities.] and need to be reformed [Need to be reined in by an active Congress that holds the members of the courts responsible and accountable for their decisions. Now, there is a novel idea. Holding judges accountable.].”

The six fabricators:

John G. Roberts, Jr., chief justice of the United States
Anthony M. Kennedy, associate justice
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, associate justice
Stephen G. Breyer, associate justice
Sonia Sotomayor, associate justice
Elena Kagan, associate justice

IMPEACH them all.

The court just redefined parent not based upon the biology of the people who created the child but on the court created myth of marriage. It had to happen. Once the court created the myth that two people of the same sex could marry each other, they had to continue the myth that two people of the same sex could actually have children together. “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.” [Sir Walter Scott, Marmion ©1808. https://www.bing.com/search?q=what+a+tangled+web+we+weave+when+we+first+practice+to+deceive&qs=n&form=QBLH&pc=EUPP_U377&sp=-1&pq=what+a+tangled+web+we+weave+when+we+first+practice+to+deceive&sc=0-61&sk=&cvid=2FA1C373693A4377B634962E5D25EED5 ]

That this case got to court demonstrates the farce of the faux “homosexual marriage” hoax. That the court ruled against the State of Arkansas demonstrates the fallacy of allowing nine unelected judges to determine the constitutionality of anything. This is not Constitutional interpretation. This is Constitutional fraud perpetrated against the American public and the United States Constitution. All six of these so-called justices ought to be impeached for violating their oath of office.

They will not be because Congress has shirked its constitutional duty of holding members of the federal courts accountable.

Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation

For Life, for liberty

Don L. Vance

“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.