Tuesday, November 8, 2016

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton: Vote for Donald Trump Because He Is the Lesser of Two Evils or Is He?

I know. I said that I was not going to post today until this evening. However, I came across an article late last night that I decided to post today. I’ve been bombarded by articles where self-proclaimed Christians declare basically that Christians must vote for Donald Trump because he is the lesser of two evils and we only have two “realistic” choicesthe radical Democrat Hillary Clinton or the radical Democrat pretending to be a Republican Donald Trump. I have never believed that and as I have said from the beginning I am “Never Hillary” and “Never Trump.” The author of the article I believe makes some valid points. Perhaps a few people may be swayed by it before the end of voting today.

I voted this morning at my neighborhood precinct. I usually vote before 7AM and then go jogging. I was running a little late and it was shortly after 7AM when I arrived at the precinct. There are two precincts that vote at the church. I’m not sure why the radical Left doesn’t shout “separate of church and State” about voting at church buildings but they don’t. They only use that lie when it stops Christians from doing something they deem inappropriate. Inappropriate is anything that interferes with their advancement of their agenda.

For our county, there were not many contested elections and not a very good selection for the contested ones. Being both “Never Trump” and “Never Hillary,” I wrote-in Darrell Castle for President and Scott Bradley for Vice President. Since both of our Senate candidates are pro-murder/abortionRepublican incumbent Mark Kirk, who is going to lose, and Democrat challenger Tammy DuckworthI wrote-in Chad Koppie. Since I am running as a write-in candidate for Illinois Congressional District 18, I wrote-in Don Vance. There is only one Statewide office election this year and I voted for the Republican incumbent who was appointed to the office because of a vacancy. I don’t vote for any Democrat and won’t until the Democrats drop their total insistence that every Democrat be pro-murder/abortion.

The State Senate seat was uncontested so I didn’t vote for the Republican incumbent. He has already won. The State House seat was uncontested and I voted for the incumbent Republican because I went to school with him years ago. I know him, played baseball with him, and graduated the year after he did. He is a solid conservative. Aren’t too many of them in office anymore for the Republicans. There was only one contested race for the county offices. The incumbent for that particular office retired. I didn’t vote for either. I don’t vote for Democrats and I didn’t know the Republican. She will probably win. Tazewell County is basically a Republican county. To win, even Democrats run as Republicans. That’s what my now deceased brother-in-law did. He was elected over and over again as a Republican to the county board. He even served as the Chairman of the Republican County Party for a number of years. He had been a Democrat since I first met him in the 1970s after he started dating my younger sister. He was a Democrat wrapped in Republican clothing. Something like Donald Trump.

Our county uses the fill-in-the-bubble (circle) ballot. Once the ballot is filled-in, the voter takes the ballot to a machine and the machine zipped the ballot into its “stomach.” My ballot was rejected by the machine because I had write-in candidates (I believe that was the reason it was rejected. The county election official didn’t actually give the reason.). A county election official had to unlock the machine, press two buttons simultaneously so that the machine would accept the ballot and zip it into its “stomach” with the rest of the cast ballots. I must have been the first one to cast a write-in ballot because she had difficulty unlocking the machine. My civic duty was complete. I voted for the best candidates I could. Of course, the top three write-ins will all lose. Not my fault. They were the best candidates, as far as I am concerned.

Darrell Castle/Scott Bradley: Constitution Party President/Vice President candidate

Website: http://castle2016.com/

Donate: https://castle2016.nationbuilder.com/donate

Chad Koppie: Constitution Party US Senate Candidate for Illinois

Website: http://www.chadkoppie.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Chad-Koppie-Campaign-175035105892775

Donate: http://www.chadkoppie.com/donations.php    

https://votevance2016.blogspot.com

Darryl Glenn: Republican Party US Senate Candidate for Colorado

Website: http://www.electdarrylglenn.com/

Donate: https://transaxt.com/Donate/6ECCUR/CommitteetoElectDarrylGlenn/?src=button

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CommitteeToElectDarrylGlenn/

Joe Miller: Libertarian Party US Senate Candidate for Alaska

https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-presidential-election-senate-of.html

Donate: http://joeforliberty.com/

Dr/Congressman John Fleming: Republican Party US Senate Candidate for Louisiana

Website: http://www.flemingforla.com/home

Donate: https://johnfleming.nationbuilder.com/donate

Donate at Make DC Listen: https://secure.makedclisten.com/donate/d?c=c8c976b8a062bfcfa0d065e176ba3030

Note: [ ] = my additions

Petition: Oppose the establishment of an International Safe Abortion Day at the UN

http://www.citizengo.org/en/lf/36999-sign-here-oppose-establishment-international-safe-abortion-day-un?dr=4611658::7f7bb99f165b41387e6b94ba4e27cb2f&utm_source=email&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTXpsak1Ua3haVFptTlRkaCIsInQiOiJ1Nm9IQ00wZUtIcEp4WlwvdDI3RWtVcTJzYkV5RjNyNk1LMVFNcHlmZ091TjNoODdCeVJmS21lUVlXRGtwSFZxVW1hZHFyeE5Nb1BaMWlKWHNaWCtWSUJSVFwvdlwvZytibVI2a2NmNmIwNm5vTT0ifQ%3D%3D

Petition: Defund Planned Parenthood through the States

http://www.citizengo.org/en/37072-states-rights-defund-planned-parenthood?dr=4611658::7f7bb99f165b41387e6b94ba4e27cb2f&utm_source=email&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTmpnd1ptUTRNR05oTVRSayIsInQiOiI1TGY3VjdnbGVabjNWUk5Od3VhY05sSVhDTEpIUytMeHJXTGRrR2VmR0gwb3NiRkVTYk5waVRZanRpTnZUK09teU53bEFlKzd6WmQ2b1RGbWIyM29qaXdOamhrVzdqanlNa3p4VXlWSmFnaz0ifQ%3D%3D

Petition: Demand Big Sports Stop Bullying North Carolina Faithful

http://www.citizengo.org/en/37077-stop-boycotting-north-carolina-political-purposes?m=5&tcid=27279809

As you know if you have been to this website regularly, I am a “Never Trump” voter. However, I am also “Never Hillary.”

The CORRUPTION of the Clinton Campaign:

Watch and learn the truth about the Clinton campaign.

Part 1: Rigging the ElectionVideo I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies (I apologize for the language from the Democrats!)

http://projectveritasaction.com/rigging-election-video-i-clinton-campaign-and-dnc-incite-violence-trump-rallies.html?utm_source=PVaction&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:32977785&utm_campaign=Release:%20Clinton%20Crime%20Family%20-%2010/17/2016

Part 2: Rigging the ElectionVideo II: Mass Voter Fraud (Again, I apologize for the language from the Democrats!)

http://projectveritasaction.com/video/rigging-election-video-ii-mass-voter-fraud?utm_source=PVaction&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:32977785&utm_campaign=Clinton%20Voter%20Fraud%20-%2010/18/2016

Part 3: Rigging the ElectionVideo III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Was PERSONALLY Involved (Again, I apologize for the language from the Democrats!)

http://projectveritasaction.com/video/rigging-election-video-iii-creamer-confirms-hillary-clinton-involvement?utm_source=PVaction&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:32977785&utm_campaign=Clinton%20Part%20III%20-%2010/24/2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEQvsK5w-jY

Petition: Hillary Clinton is unfit to be President of the United States and should be indicted [I will add that if elected President which is possible given the other major party candidate, be impeached by the House of Representatives with the process beginning January 3rd before she takes office on January 20th.]:

http://www.flemingforla.com/hillary?utm_campaign=hrc_unfit2&utm_medium=email&utm_source=johnfleming


Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation


I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative.



http://townhall.com/columnists/frmarcelguarnizo/2016/11/06/trump-is-not-the-lesser-of-two-evils-n2242149?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
Fr. Marcel Guarnizo | November 06, 2016

“A growing number of Christian leaders have taken to asserting that voting for Donald Trump is morally necessary [What is their definition of moral?]. Threads of their arguments stem from the classic but highly flawed ‘lesser of two evils’ defense of the Trump candidacy: arguments that Trump is pro-life [Not!], and the claim that a President Trump will make better choices when appointing justices of the Supreme Court [There is a continued overemphasis in the importance of the federal courts because we have allowed the courts to unconstitutionally become the final deciders of almost everything! That is NOT what the Constitution requires OR allows!].

Author and Christian apologist Eric Metaxas took the pro-Trump lesser of two evils argument to an extreme by asserting on the op-ed page of the Wall Street Journal, that we will have to face the severe judgment of God on the Last Day if we do not subject ourselves to voting for Donald Trump [What!]. This instrumentalization of religion and of that, which is most sacred, is nothing short of deplorable. It borders on the blasphemous to claim God’s will is a Trump vote [How does he even begin to know that to be a fact? From the Word of GOD?]. Eric Metaxas of course can offer nothing to substantiate this sublime knowledge he offers to the public. Using God’s name for the sake of very dubious temporal political aims, to serve Trump, needs to be soundly rejected [Amen!].

I hope Eric Metaxas, whom I know, comes to realize that much we have learned about Donald Trump by simply observing his behavior and studying his history, seems plausibly inconsistent with everything we know of the spirit of Christ. This is something all must freely judge based on the evidence at hand. Not on ‘private revelations.’

The Lesser of Two Evils Fallacy

Metaxas built his argument on a fallacy of logic, namely that this election is a binary choice [That is where they all seem to start! Can not change the system if you accept that two evil choices are the only choices allowed!]. Many have already retorted to this obvious falsehood noting that nothing consisting of more than two choices is binary. The fact that we can vote for a third party, a different candidate, vote only in the races for House of Representative and Senate—or decline to vote at all—makes clear that the binary dogma is logically unsustainable. A binary choice would be to vote or not to vote, no third option. The fact that we can foresee the likelihood of Hillary or Trump winning in the present circumstances does not leave voters facing a simple binary choice [Remember Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego? The king thought they had a binary choice. Either worship him as god or die. The king was wrong!].

The second error embedded in the lesser of two evils argument derives from the lack of understanding of the fundamental principle of extension of a moral action. An individual is responsible for one thing and one thing only, and that is the vote he or she casts [Exactly! It is MY vote and no one elses! I am responsible for my vote. I am NOT responsible for how others vote or why they vote as they do!]. Individuals have no moral responsibility for things that they cannot control. It is not rational for an individual to feel morally responsible for the result of an election. The only vote he must account for is the one he cast. The argument that somehow if Clinton gets into power it is the fault of those who did not vote for Trump is manipulation of the minds of the less informed [It is an outright lie!].

It is not sound to vote for an unfit candidate, regardless of whether or not we can find a fit candidate to vote for. The responsibility to never vote for an unfit candidate seems a reasonable standard by which we should abide. Nor are we morally obliged to figure out who is most unfit—an impossible exercise [The lesser of two evils is still evil!]. Once we see a candidate is unfit, we must take him or her off the table [For Donald Trump, I did from the beginning. He was last on the list of candidates in the Republican primary. Last for a number of reasons including that he is a Democrat in Republican clothing!]. Nearly every Trump supporter I talk to would not hire Trump. Why should they then foist him upon America?

If we were to deem all candidates unfit we simply would have to refrain from casting a vote for any of them. Trump is not simply a flawed candidate. This characterization is a clever euphemism that seeks to camouflage the unmitigated disaster that Trump has shown himself to be. He is intellectually underdeveloped as a candidate (very likely suffering from attention deficit disorder, acutely); he seems morally depraved; he has assaulted women as he bragged; he likely has psychopathy and narcissistic clinical disorder. He simply seems to many of us mentally not competent to serve as president of the United States [Morally not competent either. I want a person of high moral character AND integrity!]

Trump and the Right to Life

Trump is also gaining momentum among pro-life leaders. Their thinking is likewise influenced by the lesser of two evils fallacy.

These pro-lifers decry the fact that Hillary is pro-abortion, undoubtedly the case. Exactly! Do not vote for Hillary [Do not ever intend to vote for a Clinton!]. Of Trump we know his position is potentially a greater evil than being anti-life: He has promised to bring abortion into the currently pro-life platform of the Republican Party. This great evil, which would effectively vanquish America’s sole viable pro-life party, is a far worse evil than the Democrats’ ongoing war on women through abortion. How can we ever vote licitly for the GOP if it goes the way of the death culture [I certainly will not! That is why I changed to the Constitution Party which is pro-life! Being pro-life is their first principle!]? Why would a ‘pro-life’ candidate make the promise to bring abortion into the GOP platform [Because he is not pro-life!]?

It is helpful to remember that while we in the pro-life movement were fighting the pro-abortion designs of Pelosi, Schumer, and Clinton, Trump was the person helping to fund their campaigns [Indeed! Just what has he done for the pro-life movement? Words are easy! Actions are required!] He has stated that Planned Parenthood does great things for millions of women. He has supported partial birth abortion. Trump sees corruption everywhere—the FBI the government, the GOP, the media, the polls—and yet Planned Parenthood is, according to Trump, a wonderful organization.

Trump deceptively claims he will defund Planned Parenthood of taxpayers’ money to do abortions. He knows well that this is already forbidden by law, with the exception of rape and incest, exceptions that Trump wants inserted into the Republican platform. His desire to include abortion exceptions in the Republican platform would give him the maneuvering room to avoid cutting funds from Planned Parenthood and pull off the con that he defunded them. [It is not the President who defunds anyone! It is Congress!] Let’s not forget the lessons of history. We know historically where the exception excuses lead: abortion on demand.

Trump will not defend the sanctity of marriage [He has specifically stated that the Supreme Court has already decided the issue! That is NOT valid! The decision was clearly unconstitutional!]. Trump’s unfurling and proud waving of the rainbow flag this week highlights the nature of the new America Trump is planning to unleash. Would a conservative be happily waving the rainbow flag to the sound of a patriotic-inspired song?

Even some Catholic leaders have tried to apply the notion of the lesser of two evils to justify their support for Trump. The argument that a legislator can licitly vote for a law that reduces abortion but does not abolish it—thereby choosing the so-called lesser of two evils—is not applicable to the case of voting for Trump to be president. In the case of the legislation that curtails the murder of the unborn during the last trimester of pregnancy, one is voting under the unfortunate banner of the lesser of two evils for no evil. But this is not inconsistent in any way with the fact that the legislator holds that no abortion should ever be committed at any time during a pregnancy. The legislator is voting for something very clearly delineated, a bill that has no variables: no abortions in the last three months. The extent of his vote has no guessing, no taking chances, none of “let’s see what happens.” It is perfectly clear that he will vote against abortion anytime he gets a chance and that is a clear and clean vote for something that is good and necessary. There is never a direct vote for evil in this case. The vote is for a good. It is entirely clear that the no abortion for the last trimester is completely good, and it is clear what he is voting for, this why it is licit.

This is, of course, not the case in voting for Trump or any individual for an elected office. Voting for a person means taking the good and the bad, one cannot delineate in these ways. It is always a prudential decision and one cannot find safety in the lesser of two evils notion. Trump cannot be circumscribed with such clarity. It is not a policy that we are voting for, or a bill in black and white. With Trump you have to vote for the person as a whole and one cannot invoke the lesser of two evils. This decision is prudential and what must be determined is whether the person is fit morally [No, he is not.], psychologically [No, he is not.], intellectually [No, he is not.] to serve as president. Secondarily, one must examine his policies but first comes the character, mental and moral soundness of the individual candidate. But to be clear it is never licit to do evil that good may come about [For sure!]. The ends do not justify the means [True.].

The Supreme Court boogey man is equally false [True.]. What the justices will do is completely outside of the power of the president. Republicans appointed six of the nine justices that gave us Roe vs. Wade [And five of the six voted to murder unborn babies!]. Another telling story is that of Justice John Roberts. Conservatives praised Roberts almost unanimously at the time of his nomination. Then came his vote on Obamacare. Furthermore there is only one vacant seat in the court and the other justices are likely to hold on until they get a Democrat in the White House [Actually, we should be impeaching them for violating their oath of office.]. The court would remain an equally liberal 5-4 and the damage would continue. Metaxas also knows that during the meeting with religious leaders in NYC, we were both there, Trump reminded us that besides his conservative list of candidates to the Supreme Court, he also has five other names which he will disclose at a later date [No one is talking about a second list.]. Wonderful can’t wait.

Vice presidential candidate Mike Pence has promised that he and Trump will overturn Roe vs. Wade. This lie is designed to bring in evangelicals and conservatives. Both Trump and Pence know they have no power to keep that promise. It is vain to promise things about which you have no control [Congress needs to overturn it and they have the constitutional power to do just that.].

The dogmatic and false premise that Clinton is worse than Trump and therefore we must vote Trump is the fallacy of using an unproven first premise to reach a false conclusion. They cannot prove that Clinton is worse. Clinton may be assumed will be worse in some aspects but the way in which Trump could be worse is also easily foreseen [True. He is a Progressive/Regressive New York liberal Democrat!].

People like Eric Metaxas and others, some unfortunately priests who ignore scripture to manipulate people into voting for Trump [sic]. Since people such as Metaxas and others are making a ‘scary’ appeal to God, who will apparently condemn us for not voting Trump, it is good to recall that in the time of Jesus the zealots (much like the Trump followers) were trying to convince Jesus to take over politically, to become king. To overthrow the oppressive Roman Empire and get hold of the keys to power and change. These revolutionaries were tempted to compromise the truth and the road of the cross for temporal mirages of political or judicial power. On one occasion when Peter was impatiently trying to convince Christ to avoid the harder way, he was rebuked by Christ with these words: ‘Get behind me Satan.’ The Christian way is to uphold goodness, virtue, morals, and principle [Exactly. Does Donald Trump exhibit any of these characteristics?]. It is not to surrender all this to a man or a woman who are some of the most prominent political anti-thesis to the gospels at present.

The Trump illusion about someone who will save America is professed by those who have forgotten there is only one Savior [And it is not Donald Trump and it is not government! Donald Trump is not even a savior.]. America is in God’s hands. This anxiety over a temporal Savior is that of men who suffer of illusions of grandeur. Metaxas wonders why we should put our trust in God and not take things into our own hands? What anti-evangelical madness is this?

The Trump temptations to the American public interestingly, parallel the temptations of the devil when Christ was praying and fasting in the desert. ‘I will make America rich [great] again…’ Trump states. He will make us the most powerful nation. He will make us winners. For as he states, he is the change we have been waiting for our entire lives [NOT. Isnt that what Barack Hussein Obama said? How well has that worked out?]. Pledge your loyalty to me, he encourages.

Not much difference with Satan’s own voice, ‘… turn these stones into bread…showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. All this I will give to you.’ (Matthew 4: 1-11).

Christian voters should ponder the question of how to truly recognize the working of the Holy Spirit in the actions of a candidate for public office. Paul teaches in his letter to the Galatians: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.’ (Galatians 5: 22). Trump is not faithful, he brags about his adulterous escapades openly. Kindness is not his creed for life. His self-control is worse than that of most teenagers. Gentleness? Please, wake up. It should be evident to all that none of which Paul states about the Spirit of God is something Trump possesses even remotely. To my friend Eric Metaxas I say, is he thinking that Jesus would vote for Trump [So it seems?]?

Those of us who have opposed these false prophets who use the name of God to manipulate people’s minds into voting for Trump will gladly on the last day face account for a no-vote for a man that embodies exactly what the scriptures warn against. Fighting the evil that may come with Hillary is precisely the way of the cross and that which we signed up for. But worse than evil, which will always exist, is the unabashed corruption of the good.

These politicians now stumping for Trump are like reeds in the wind, blowing wherever they think their political chances of remaining relevant will take them. Rick Perry before he succumbed to the temptation said this: Trump, ‘offers a barking carnival act … a toxic mix of demagoguery and mean-spiritedness and nonsense that will lead the Republican party to perdition…’ Ted Cruz just a few months ago, Trump is, ‘… narcissist’, ‘pathological liar’, ‘utterly amoral’, a ‘serial philanderer.’ Mike Pence thought that some of Trump’s policies were ‘… offensive and unconstitutional.’

Whatever happened to Santorum and Huckabee’s family values position? Trump has made it clear that he does not ask God for forgiveness. [According to him, he does not have to seek forgiveness. He has done nothing that needs to be forgiven! Right!] In which Gospel is it that these faux Christian leaders find the doctrine of un-repentance to be laudable? For the scriptures I read state that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.

Darrell Castle is the only Constitutional, conservative candidate running for President who is on, at least, twenty State ballots!

You can not win the election if you do not run for the office. You can not win the election if you do not get on the ballot.

Vote Darrell Castle for President. The Constitutional Conservative!

I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative.


Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation

For Life, for liberty

Don L. Vance

“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.